Radicals go on a witch hunt in Toronto

Recently, we have seen a witch hunt by radicals against the elected Mayor of Toronto. The allegedly left-wing radicals are no longer able to freely gorge themselves at the trough of taxpayers' monies since the end of 2010. The social reconstruction projects of a non-elected cabal of extremists do not only attack Toronto’s mayor, but they now attack the huge majority of Toronto's citizens who voted to make their councillors actually accountable for how they chomp through taxpayer funds. Most of the radicals’ causes have little or nothing to do with left-wing ideals of correcting unnatural inequality or achieving representative democracy, but somehow, those with prejudice within their hearts have finagled radical biases into an over-arching cause.

 

Toronto has certainly seen more than its fair share of taxpayer funds going to causes that add nothing to society or its culture, but are essentially free hand-outs for those causes that cannot attract any financial or other support. It’s also a city where the “public service” unions were given the keys to the till in the 7 years of Miller/Pantalone NDP ridden rule. 7 years where the budget effectively doubled from $6 Billion to just under $12 Billion, for less services to the average citizen. As a backlash, Toronto voted against more of the same and elected a mayor who wished to at least restrict the unions’ access to the till somewhat.
 
The radicals did not like this and the little connected covert cabal of evil-doers have sought every slimey trick to attack the Mayor, and any councillor not seen to be in their pockets. Sadly, there are certain lawyers in the city prepared to take pro bono work on for these low lives; heaven forbid that the radicals should actually pay for anything themselves.These lawyers are of the ilk who have little, if any, justice in their cause, and as such revert to nefarious tactics. I have watched with horror the abusive tactics being perpetrated upon the Mayor of Toronto and recognise these as being too easily entertained by the Courts. These tactics include eschewing written answers to fair questions, and these lawyers are certainly not averse to slurring the credibility of good people in order to be granted cross examinations by Courts which tolerate this chicanery. This sort of lawyer do everything they can to cross examine people viva voce, because their aims are to inflate costs, harassment of plaintiffs, hindrance, and if lucky, to trick the cross examinee and they have no compunction about adding information. These gutter lawyers often withhold information themselves until the juncture of the cross examination and their acts have nothing to do with achieving justice. The Law Societies, because they are also industry associations, are loath to censure members. Sadly, this attack on Toronto’s duly elected mayor is not just an isolated incident but a method of practice for many lawyers who abuse the processes set up to enable real justice for all.